What Happened to Rachel Aldana’s Stomach?

Plenty of excercise and a good diet or a tummy tuck? I don’t know what happened to Rachel Aldana’s waist but it’s a lot smaller than the last time I posted her. Good for her that she lost the weight but I don’t know if I like it, her tits are still huge though.

Pictures from: Rachel Aldana

Rachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing toplessRachel Aldana posing topless

Furiosa XXX
Furiosa XXX: Porn parody of the upcoming Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga which will be released this year! Streaming at Cosplayground!

26 comments on “What Happened to Rachel Aldana’s Stomach?”

  1. Fergy89406 says:

    I liked her better before, but she still looks very spectacular!

  2. Xan says:

    her face is prettier.

  3. jazzgrenade says:

    She looks great!

    I know I’ve been distracted by her boobs before but when did she get those awful tattoos?

  4. Me says:

    I think she’s looking great. The big boobs look even better when they sit above a small waist. Also, it shows she cares about her appearance.

    And I agree with Xan, she’s looking prettier. Partly due to weight loss, and party due to much more subtle makeup.

    Could do without the tattoos, though. But the boobs make up for them!

  5. iNinja says:

    In before “Photoshop”

  6. fail says:

    What a waste… she’d be lucky if she’s a DD now. Look how smal her boobs are compared to what they used to be! Being thin doesn’t suit her one bit, in my opinion. Now will someone tell me why we should keep paying attention to her? She is just another thin, DD breasted woman with tattoos all over her body. She lost her redeeming factors along with her weight and boobs.

    In fact this reminds me of a nearly identical case – Lucy Pinder. Once a busty model then some a-hole decided to tell her to lose weight. What happened after that? Buggered if I know, nobody pays any attention to her anymore. Notice how she dropped off the face of Boobieblog?

  7. morrdigan says:

    I completely disagree with fail. She looks way hotter now. And her tits are still plenty huge. You don’t have to care about her anymore, I will pick up your slack.

  8. Xan says:

    tattoos are dumb, i hope shes down with getting them.

  9. Rexx says:

    You can really see it in her face and legs (and obviously waist). I don’t hate it, but it’s almost like she’s a different girl.

  10. Deckard says:

    I’m fairly certain I read that she wanted a boob reduction (which is understandable as she complained that they wouldn’t stop growing). It appears that she got somewhat a reduction, but as you said Niklas, a tummy tuck or something, as well as some work done to her face, and some tattoos.

    I guess she really wanted a makeover, in the style of Heidi Montag – multiple surgeries all at once.

    Though unlike Heidi who went too far, I can’t say this girl did. See her face to face and I daresay all of you naysayers will lose blood in your brain as it goes somewhere else.

    And there is NO way her boobs are too small. They’re actually huge on her frame, making her look like a tiny girl with buge hoobs.

  11. Deckard says:

    Hm, actually, I made time to search and I didn’t find anything printed about surgery… maybe she didn’t after all? Ah well, she looks good anyways :P.

  12. ac3boy says:

    DD??? In no way are those near DD! LOL (as in small enuf to be DD)

  13. lol no says:

    Gross tits.

  14. Knickerless says:

    Some commenters here seem to have an exaggerated idea of what DD’s look like. Her tits are huge and easily a DD or larger.

  15. r says:

    It all looks good to me.

  16. ac3boy says:

    Easily an F or more. Sheesh

  17. Hack says:

    Actually her tits looks smaller, you can tell she has lost some weight.
    Face & Body wise looks better now, but I miss the old tits!

  18. Niklas (fake) says:

    She’s not very good looking if not for the enormous tits. I actually dig the tattoos. They make her look trashier and therefore easier. Kinda like the kinda girl you bang from behind in the back alley.
    Hope she gets desperate and start doing hardcore.

  19. mattashmead says:

    u all really would turn her down just cos shes got a few tattoos? sure you would. shes lost a little weight, but the one pic of her on all fours has a load of light on her lower back making her look skinnier, as for lucy pinder, she hasnt lost weight and is still a regular in any decent lads mag in the uk.

  20. Tstorm73 says:

    It’s all about proportion. She was PERFECT before the weight loss. Everything about her physique went together. Why do girls who do not need to lose weight think they look better smaller? She still looks attractive but I still highly prefer her before the weight loss.

  21. Wedge says:

    Double D’s? WTF? Yeah, she couldn’t even squeeze those into a DD cup!

  22. Fergy89406 says:

    True words Tstorm! I thought she was perfect before as well.

    And yeah, it’s a little tragic when a large breasted model loses weight, because usually the first place they lose the weight from is from the chest. As a few had commented previously, the most easily recognizable is Lucy Pinder. Another is Michelle Marsh. Both women were perfect the way they were…. and BAM…. they lost weight and their breast size dropped dramatically.

  23. Niklas (fake) says:

    I don’t think Lucy Pinder and Michelle Marsh are the hottest lad mag models. My favorites are Lindsey Strutt and Keeley Hazell. Obviously I’m not just judging strictly from the tits. All 4 of them are “main chick” quality though.
    Fat whores like Rachel and Leanne Crow are more like the “side girl” type, but again you’re not a straight man if you turn them down. But it’s more of an animalistic urge to bang them like a beast in the alley than the type you go on a date with then bang them behind closed doors.

  24. soul says:

    I get what Niklas is saying. Yeah, her face can’t compete with Kelley’s or Lucy’s (I diverge on MM, but such things are a matter of opinion). However, I like truly massive tits, and she’s hot enough that her tits put her over the others as far as I’m concerned.

    If you’re of the opinion that anything over a D doesn’t really earn extra points, that Rachel can’t tough those girls. If breast size is more or less it for you, then you’re probably going to like Rachel.

    Or if you just like them thick, which is a legitimate enough opinion for a boob-man(or woman) to hold.

  25. Dumdidum says:

    fail is right!!
    “What a waste… she’d be lucky if she’s a DD now. Look how smal her boobs are compared to what they used to be! Being thin doesn’t suit her one bit, in my opinion. Now will someone tell me why we should keep paying attention to her? She is just another thin, DD breasted woman with tattoos all over her body. She lost her redeeming factors along with her weight and boobs.
    In fact this reminds me of a nearly identical case – Lucy Pinder. Once a busty model then some a-hole decided to tell her to lose weight. What happened after that? Buggered if I know, nobody pays any attention to her anymore. Notice how she dropped off the face of Boobieblog?”

    I totally agree with fail!! She destroyed her body, look ugly now, was much better before.
    Face better before, Boobs not worth to look anymore.. sad story!

  26. Dumdidum says:

    by the way her ass is gone as well 🙁

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *