9 comments on “Mila Azul is Pretty Like a Flower!”

  1. BeerMan says:

    Is she legal?!?!

  2. D4V3 says:

    Yeah, she’s 19 in this shoot, but she’s 20 now.

  3. IvanLeTerrible says:

    Bitch looks underage and anorexic to me, so NOPE…

  4. scooter says:

    she doesn’t look underage…she’s just a picture of youth.
    luckily, legal youth.

    she looks fantastic.

  5. M.W. says:

    It`s maybe because of her face – her face looks for me really innocent, really teenager-like. Her body is insane, but the face puts me off.
    Anyway, huge difference when you compare her to typical look of american porn star, often with destroyed and tired face.

  6. V says:

    Braced for whatever incoming shade, but I cannot STAND women who are completely hairless down there. Even if they are 18+, it looks disturbingly prepubescent IMHO

    1. Ninja squirrel says:

      I agree entirely! Puberty happens for a reason, and the changes to the human (female) body include growth of hair in several places. The practice of shaving the legs/armpits is reasonable, what with revealing outfits, but I say any more than cleaning the bikini line is wrong.

  7. Muhhop says:

    She would be perfect with a bit more weight.

  8. 8 Inch Tool says:

    I’d love to plaster her pretty face with a thick, sticky load!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *