This is a bit of a waste, I think Lohan needed to show some trim to move the needle a bit with this pictorial. She’s a curvy and naturally attractive woman, but unfortunately this feels like something you’ve seen before and moved on from. Playboy dropped the ball here, big-time.
A really boring shoot. I was expecting something exciting and titillating but this just seems generic and directionless. Wether Lindsay just isn’t the sexy girl everyone thinks she is or the director of the shoot didn’t know how to play it I don’t know but this is just all very “meh” and disappointing.
Really not a great set of photos, simply because they’re so obviously massively edited. When you see “candid” shots of her, you realize she has a great set of natural tits and good legs. She probably could stand to work on her ass and thighs a bit, but still, she’s got a figure most women would kill for and most men would jizz over. Considering how she’s (allegedly) drunk and drugged her way through her early life, she’s probably going to hit the wall badly in the near future, which is a shame because she’s got a solid foundation. I’m kind of glad they didn’t show “pink” in these photos, because I hate to think they’d have to photoshop that bit as well….
Overall, though, I’m always happy to see her without clothes.
this is another example of why Playboy sucks!! no pussy shots,too much airbrushing to the point she is unrecognizable,bad lighting and an uniinspired layout for someone who gives me hard one just watching wlak into a courtroom with those luscious tits.I have seen better layouts of lindsay in another magazines both clothed and semi nude.they dropped the ball big on this one.she has a great rack ,nice legs and i like the freckles and tattoos. standard Playboy generic shoot.they would have done better with a more natural less staged layout.she still has great tits but I REALLY wanted a pussy shot.
Dear photoshop fags: FUCK YOU AND YOUR EDITING!.. srsly. I cant fap to this lol. This shit looks awful.. she looks like a cartoon or something, and I dont fap to cartoons. These guys are soooooo lost.. looking for perfection that any wrinkle or curve has to be eliminated. So you end up with a smooth, lifeless, linear, generic THING; cause that is not a person.
I care, because the amount of processing on this photo is so high that they might as well have just rendered it with a computer. This looks like The Adventures of Tintin or something.
This is in no way representative of what she looks like naked. I mean shit, even those shadows on her left side look bizarre.
This is one giant soft focus, clone stamp, airbrush, liquefy filter, smudge tool mess! It’s done with enormous amounts of skill…I’m sure Playboy artists are top in their field but they have limits, and this stretched completely beyond them. IMO it doesn’t even look real.
Hate airbrush. I think a womans imperfection is what makes them hot. Like Cindy crawfords beauty mark (mole) on her face. Any other mole looks gross. Natural is what people want, i don’t want a woman to look like a cartoon character.