This was posted on The Nip Slip a few minutes ago but I think it would be fitting to post here as well since its about boobs.
Actress and comedy guru Judd Apatow’s wife Leslie Mann appears to be topless in the recently released comedy The Change-Up but, is she really baring it all? In an interview with Access Hollywood the actress admitted that her exposed boobs were actually an enhanced prosthetic and not the real deal.
It’s also been reported that Olivia Wilde was wearing pasties during her sex scene in the same movie with Ryan Reynolds and, that nipples were added afterwards with CGI. This is what she said on Jimmy Kimmel: “I wasn’t actually naked but now appear to be naked because… in that scene Ryan Reynolds is supposed to be covering them (with his body) and he moved and so the pasties were in the movie and so they had to paint in nipples using CGI.”
So what do you think of this trend that actresses choose to cover up during the shoot and the nudity is added afterwards with computers? This might be one of the dark sides to movie special effects becoming more and more realistic. Will the days of actresses dropping their clothes on the big screen for real be a thing of the past?
It’s one thing to use cgi to fix an error during filming but another to use an actual prosthetic. Sure the actress will feel more comfortable during filming knowing she’s not really naked but then she looks naked on film so why not show the real deal.
The olivia wilde one i believe. But i think the leslie mann one is a crock of shit she said to make herself sound more wholesome. I have not seen the movie but if that still is from it, then why would she wear a prosthetic where one boob is clearly bigger then the other? I also dont believe diora baird was wearing a prosthetic.
Everyone should watch the movie, “Looker”. The technology shown in that old movie is now happening; replacing a human actor with a perfect, digital CGI image of him/her. Lifelike looking CGI boobs are just the begining! The real actors can stay home, and their screen personna will never age, get fat, go bald, etc, etc….
Why are the studios willing to pay for the effects work when it’s so much easier and cheaper to just have the actresses (and actors, too) be actually naked?
If it’s for plot reasons like Mark Wahlberg in Boogie Nights or Selma Blair in A Dirty Shame then prosthetics or CGI makes sense, but otherwise, either do a nude scene or don’t. This CGI-nipple stuff is garbage.
Diora Baird has been nude in plenty of films. Hell, she kicked off her career with an underwhelming nude pictorial in “Playboy.” Why would she cover up now? Sorry, honey, but modesty and a substantial film career waved you good-bye the moment you pulled those beautiful suckers out the first time.
Some of the great movies like titanic or terminator nude scenes was required(arnold coming from the future in clothes had made story line stupid) and in the change up nudity was not really needed but to use GGI niples or body double not that its just stupid..i expected this from actresses but not from Columbia, WB… next time when an actress like mila kunis refuse to get nekkid in the movie they should just replace her with her body double or a french actress
Leave a Reply
DO NOT MISS ANY BOOBIE BLOG UPDATES! Subscribe Today!! Its Free!
TOP LIVE CAM GIRLS Click the pics to view their profiles
Get the same massive boobs for half the price. The Porn Castle discount rates give you unlimited access to the hottest sites in the big tits niche. No codes to remember or copy, just click and join at the discounted rate!