Well, this Denise Milani nip slip definatly looks real to me! I think it also confirms that the other nip slip I posted is real as well because those are two very similar nipples. Im happy about obtaining these shots but I still want her to pose fully topless. Thanks to Volume for the pic.
I don’t think that’s photoshopped. The nipple is symmetrical with the other one so to ‘shop’ the artist would have had to move the strap and cloth from her lingerie…unless Denise has some strangely placed nipples. And why go through all the trouble for a nip-slip fake where you can only see part of the nipple?
Also, I’m an artist and I work in Photoshop daily and this shot is so good and so well done that it would rival the best fakes I have ever seen…not something generally done on a nip-slip.
The image is NOT photoshopped as it is the very same image from the .rar photo set I downloaded from her web site when I was still a member. If I recall correctly, the webmaster later deleted that image, it’s most likely he simply missed this nip-slip.
The one that Nicklas posted was at a lower resolution than the other. Of course the pixels look different, they are but not because somebody painted a nipple. The one with the nipple gone was at a higher resolution, which could indicate that it’s the original…but it’s hardly proof. It just means that at some point they were both at a higher resolution, not which one is the original. In no way does it indicate which one was altered.
So if you mean something else about the pixels please explain it, but a change in resolution is all I see. I use Photoshop professionally every day, and have a BA in art & design and I see no evidence to say which the original.
As I said, I checked this picture in its original 5 megapixel version as it was downloadable on her web site, and I saw no signs of photoshopping (why would her own webmaster photoshop a fake nipple in one of her photo sets)?
Its the real deal, guys.
Now stop obsessing over it.